Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya. Càtedra de la Sida i Malalties Relacionades
dc.contributor.authorNegredo, Eugenia
dc.contributor.authorBonjoch, Anna
dc.contributor.authorPérez Alvarez, Núria
dc.contributor.authorOrnelas, Arelly
dc.contributor.authorPuig, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorHerrero, C.
dc.contributor.authorEstany, Carla
dc.contributor.authorRío, L. del
dc.contributor.authorGregorio, S. di
dc.contributor.authorEcheverria, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorClotet, Bonaventura
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-03T09:45:59Z
dc.date.available2015-11-03T09:45:59Z
dc.date.created2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNegredo, E., Bonjoch, A., Perez-Alvarez, N., Ornelas, A., Puig, J., Herrero, C., et al. (2015). Comparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: Single dose versus two doses in 2 years. Hiv Medicine, 16(7), 441-448.ca_ES
dc.identifier.issn1468-1293
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10854/4334
dc.description.abstractObjectives Given the need for easily managed treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of zoledronate, by comparing three groups of patients: those with annual administration, those with biennial administration (one dose in 2 years) and a control group with no administration of zoledronate. Methods We randomized (2:1) 31 patients on antiretroviral therapy with low bone mineral density (BMD) to zoledronate (5 mg administered intravenously; 21 patients) plus diet counselling and to a control group (diet counselling; 10 patients). At week 48, patients treated with zoledronate were randomized again to receive a second dose (two-dose group; n = 12) or to continue with diet counselling only (single-dose group; n = 9). Changes in lumbar spine and hip BMD and bone turnover markers were compared. Results The median percentage change from baseline to week 96 in L1−L4 BMD was −1.74% [interquartile range (IQR) −2.56, 3.60%], 7.90% (IQR 4.20, 16.57%) and 5.22% (IQR 2.02, 7.28%) in the control, two-dose and single-dose groups, respectively (P < 0.01, control vs. two doses; P = 0.02, control vs. single dose; P = 0.18, two doses vs. single dose). Hip BMD changed by a median of 2.12% (IQR −0.12, 3.08%), 5.16% (IQR 3.06, 6.74%) and 4.47% (IQR 1, 5.58%), respectively (P = 0.04, control vs. two doses; P = 0.34, two doses vs. single dose). No differences between the two-dose and single-dose groups were detected in bone markers at week 96. Conclusions The benefits for BMD of a single dose of zoledronate in 2 years may be comparable to those obtained with two doses of the drug after 96 weeks, although this study is insufficiently powered to exclude a real difference. Future studies should explore whether biennial administration of zoledronate is a useful alternative in the treatment of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients.ca_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent8 p.ca_ES
dc.language.isoengca_ES
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingca_ES
dc.rightsTots els drets reservatsca_ES
dc.rights(c) Wiley
dc.subject.otherSida -- Tractamentca_ES
dc.subject.otherVIH (Virus)ca_ES
dc.titleComparison of two different strategies of treatment with zoledronate in HIV-infected patients with low bone mineral density: single dose versus two doses in 2 yearsca_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12260
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessca_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/publishedVersionca_ES
dc.indexacioIndexat a WOS/JCRca_ES
dc.indexacioIndexat a SCOPUS


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Compartir en TwitterCompartir en LinkedinCompartir en FacebookCompartir en TelegramCompartir en WhatsappImprimir